Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? ASML Holding N.V. or The Trade Desk, Inc.

ASML vs. The Trade Desk: SG&A Cost Strategies Unveiled

__timestampASML Holding N.V.The Trade Desk, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201431867200023975000
Thursday, January 1, 201534570000040070000
Friday, January 1, 201637480000078219000
Sunday, January 1, 2017416600000119825000
Monday, January 1, 2018488000000171981000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019520500000275930000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020544900000346359000
Friday, January 1, 2021725600000623959000
Saturday, January 1, 2022909600000863142000
Sunday, January 1, 20231113200000968248000
Monday, January 1, 202411657000001082333000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of technology and advertising, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. ASML Holding N.V., a leader in semiconductor manufacturing, and The Trade Desk, Inc., a pioneer in digital advertising, offer a fascinating study in cost optimization from 2014 to 2023.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

ASML's SG&A expenses grew steadily, peaking at approximately 1.1 billion in 2023, reflecting a strategic investment in growth. Meanwhile, The Trade Desk saw a dramatic rise, with expenses increasing from a modest 24 million in 2014 to nearly 970 million in 2023. This represents a staggering 40-fold increase, underscoring their aggressive expansion strategy.

Who Optimizes Better?

While ASML's expenses grew by about 250%, The Trade Desk's expenses surged by over 4000%. This raises questions about efficiency versus growth, and which strategy will ultimately yield better returns.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025