ASML Holding N.V. or TE Connectivity Ltd.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

ASML vs. TE Connectivity: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampASML Holding N.V.TE Connectivity Ltd.
Wednesday, January 1, 20143186720001882000000
Thursday, January 1, 20153457000001504000000
Friday, January 1, 20163748000001463000000
Sunday, January 1, 20174166000001591000000
Monday, January 1, 20184880000001594000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20195205000001490000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205449000001392000000
Friday, January 1, 20217256000001512000000
Saturday, January 1, 20229096000001584000000
Sunday, January 1, 202311132000001670000000
Monday, January 1, 202411657000001732000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: ASML Holding N.V. or TE Connectivity Ltd.?

In the competitive landscape of global technology companies, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, ASML Holding N.V. and TE Connectivity Ltd. have shown distinct approaches to handling these costs.

From 2014 to 2023, ASML's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 250%, reflecting its aggressive expansion strategy. In contrast, TE Connectivity Ltd. maintained a more stable SG&A cost structure, with only a 10% increase over the same period. This suggests a more conservative approach to cost management.

Interestingly, while ASML's expenses surged, TE Connectivity Ltd. consistently reported higher absolute SG&A costs, indicating its larger operational scale. However, the data for 2024 is incomplete, leaving room for speculation on future trends.

Understanding these dynamics offers valuable insights into each company's strategic priorities and operational efficiencies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025