Cost of Revenue Comparison: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Roper Technologies, Inc.

Thomson Reuters vs Roper: A Decade of Cost Dynamics

__timestampRoper Technologies, Inc.Thomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201414475950009209000000
Thursday, January 1, 201514177490008810000000
Friday, January 1, 201614575150008232000000
Sunday, January 1, 201717426750008079000000
Monday, January 1, 201819117000004131000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201919397000002431000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202019841000002269000000
Friday, January 1, 202118604000002478000000
Saturday, January 1, 202216190000002408000000
Sunday, January 1, 202318706000004095000000
Monday, January 1, 20242160900000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for evaluating a company's efficiency. This comparison between Thomson Reuters Corporation and Roper Technologies, Inc. offers a fascinating glimpse into their financial strategies over the past decade.

A Decade of Financial Dynamics

From 2014 to 2023, Thomson Reuters consistently reported higher costs of revenue compared to Roper Technologies. Notably, in 2014, Thomson Reuters' cost of revenue was approximately 6.4 times that of Roper Technologies. However, by 2023, this ratio had decreased to about 2.2, indicating a significant reduction in Thomson Reuters' cost structure.

Strategic Shifts

The data reveals a pivotal shift in 2018 when Thomson Reuters' cost of revenue dropped by nearly 50% from the previous year, reflecting strategic realignments. Meanwhile, Roper Technologies maintained a steady increase, peaking in 2020. This analysis underscores the importance of strategic cost management in maintaining competitive advantage.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025