Texas Instruments Incorporated or Cadence Design Systems, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Texas Instruments vs. Cadence Design Systems

__timestampCadence Design Systems, Inc.Texas Instruments Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 20145133070001843000000
Thursday, January 1, 20155124140001748000000
Friday, January 1, 20165203000001767000000
Sunday, January 1, 20175533420001694000000
Monday, January 1, 20185730750001684000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196214790001645000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206708850001623000000
Friday, January 1, 20217492800001666000000
Saturday, January 1, 20228463400001704000000
Sunday, January 1, 20239206490001825000000
Monday, January 1, 202410397660001794000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: Texas Instruments or Cadence Design Systems?

In the competitive landscape of semiconductor companies, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Texas Instruments Incorporated and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. have shown distinct trends in their SG&A expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Texas Instruments consistently maintained higher SG&A expenses, peaking in 2014 and 2023. However, their expenses have shown a slight downward trend, decreasing by approximately 2.6% over the period. In contrast, Cadence Design Systems has seen a steady increase in SG&A expenses, rising by about 79% from 2014 to 2023. This divergence highlights different strategic approaches: Texas Instruments appears to focus on cost efficiency, while Cadence invests more in growth. Missing data for 2024 suggests a need for further analysis to understand future trends. As these companies evolve, their SG&A management will remain a key factor in their financial health.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025