SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Adobe Inc. and NetApp, Inc.

SG&A Efficiency: Adobe vs. NetApp Over a Decade

__timestampAdobe Inc.NetApp, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201422151400002179200000
Thursday, January 1, 201522151610002197400000
Friday, January 1, 201624879070002099000000
Sunday, January 1, 201728222980001904000000
Monday, January 1, 201833657270002009000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201941249840001935000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202045590000001848000000
Friday, January 1, 202154060000002001000000
Saturday, January 1, 202261870000002136000000
Sunday, January 1, 202367640000002094000000
Monday, January 1, 202472930000002136000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Tech Giants

In the ever-evolving tech landscape, understanding operational efficiency is crucial. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Adobe Inc. and NetApp, Inc. from 2014 to 2024. Adobe's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 229% over the decade, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy and market expansion. In contrast, NetApp's expenses have remained relatively stable, with a modest increase of about 3% over the same period, indicating a more conservative approach.

Adobe's significant rise in SG&A expenses, peaking at $7.3 billion in 2024, underscores its commitment to innovation and market leadership. Meanwhile, NetApp's steady expenses, hovering around $2.1 billion, highlight its focus on maintaining operational efficiency. This comparison offers valuable insights into how these tech giants allocate resources to drive growth and sustain competitive advantage.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025