Lam Research Corporation and The Trade Desk, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

SG&A Spending: Lam Research vs. The Trade Desk

__timestampLam Research CorporationThe Trade Desk, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201461334100023975000
Thursday, January 1, 201559161100040070000
Friday, January 1, 201663095400078219000
Sunday, January 1, 2017667485000119825000
Monday, January 1, 2018762219000171981000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019702407000275930000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020682479000346359000
Friday, January 1, 2021829875000623959000
Saturday, January 1, 2022885737000863142000
Sunday, January 1, 2023832753000968248000
Monday, January 1, 20248682470001082333000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

SG&A Spending Patterns: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the spending patterns of industry giants can offer valuable insights. Lam Research Corporation and The Trade Desk, Inc. present a fascinating case study in SG&A (Selling, General, and Administrative) expenses from 2014 to 2023.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

Lam Research, a leader in semiconductor manufacturing, has shown a steady increase in SG&A expenses, peaking in 2022 with a 44% rise from 2014. Meanwhile, The Trade Desk, a digital advertising powerhouse, has experienced a staggering 3,933% increase over the same period, reflecting its rapid growth and market expansion.

Key Insights

While Lam Research's spending reflects a stable growth strategy, The Trade Desk's aggressive increase highlights its dynamic market positioning. Notably, 2023 data for The Trade Desk is missing, suggesting potential shifts in strategy or reporting. This comparison underscores the diverse approaches companies take in managing operational costs.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025