Comparative EBITDA Analysis: Lam Research Corporation vs The Trade Desk, Inc.

Lam Research vs. The Trade Desk: A Decade of Growth

__timestampLam Research CorporationThe Trade Desk, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014977923000580000
Thursday, January 1, 2015115522400032824000
Friday, January 1, 2016136528400061316000
Sunday, January 1, 2017221883700076565000
Monday, January 1, 20183539694000107323000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192774013000112196000
Wednesday, January 1, 20202942327000144208000
Friday, January 1, 20214789174000124817000
Saturday, January 1, 20225715561000168079000
Sunday, January 1, 20235637608000280898000
Monday, January 1, 20244905157000427167000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

A Tale of Two Companies: Lam Research vs. The Trade Desk

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology and advertising, Lam Research Corporation and The Trade Desk, Inc. stand as titans in their respective fields. Over the past decade, Lam Research has demonstrated a robust growth trajectory, with its EBITDA surging by over 480% from 2014 to 2023. This semiconductor equipment giant reached its peak in 2022, showcasing its resilience and adaptability in a competitive market.

Conversely, The Trade Desk, a leader in digital advertising, has experienced a more modest yet steady growth. From 2014 to 2023, its EBITDA increased by nearly 380%, reflecting the dynamic nature of the advertising industry. Notably, 2023 marked a significant milestone for The Trade Desk, with its EBITDA reaching its highest point, despite missing data for 2024.

This comparative analysis highlights the diverse growth patterns and market strategies of these two influential companies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025