Lam Research Corporation and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

SG&A Spending: Broadridge vs. Lam Research

__timestampBroadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.Lam Research Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014376000000613341000
Thursday, January 1, 2015396800000591611000
Friday, January 1, 2016420900000630954000
Sunday, January 1, 2017501400000667485000
Monday, January 1, 2018565400000762219000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019577500000702407000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020639000000682479000
Friday, January 1, 2021744300000829875000
Saturday, January 1, 2022832300000885737000
Sunday, January 1, 2023849000000832753000
Monday, January 1, 2024916800000868247000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

SG&A Spending Patterns: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the spending patterns of industry giants can offer valuable insights. Over the past decade, Lam Research Corporation and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. have demonstrated distinct trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2024, Broadridge's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 144%, reflecting a strategic expansion and investment in operational capabilities. In contrast, Lam Research's SG&A expenses grew by about 42%, indicating a more measured approach to administrative spending.

Key Insights

Broadridge's consistent increase in SG&A expenses, peaking in 2024, suggests a robust growth strategy, possibly driven by market expansion and technological advancements. Meanwhile, Lam Research's spending plateaued in recent years, hinting at a focus on efficiency and cost management. These patterns underscore the diverse strategies companies employ to navigate competitive markets and drive shareholder value.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025