Lam Research Corporation or HP Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Lam Research vs. HP Inc.

__timestampHP Inc.Lam Research Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201413353000000613341000
Thursday, January 1, 20154720000000591611000
Friday, January 1, 20163840000000630954000
Sunday, January 1, 20174376000000667485000
Monday, January 1, 20184866000000762219000
Tuesday, January 1, 20195368000000702407000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204906000000682479000
Friday, January 1, 20215741000000829875000
Saturday, January 1, 20225264000000885737000
Sunday, January 1, 20235356000000832753000
Monday, January 1, 20245658000000868247000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: Lam Research or HP Inc.?

In the competitive landscape of technology giants, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, HP Inc. and Lam Research Corporation have showcased contrasting strategies in handling these costs.

A Decade of Financial Insights

From 2014 to 2024, HP Inc. has consistently reported higher SG&A expenses compared to Lam Research. In 2014, HP's expenses were over 21 times higher than Lam's, highlighting a significant difference in scale and operational strategy. However, HP has managed to reduce its SG&A expenses by approximately 58% from 2014 to 2016, indicating a strategic shift towards cost efficiency.

Conversely, Lam Research has maintained a steady increase in its SG&A expenses, reflecting its growth and expansion strategy. By 2024, Lam's expenses have increased by about 42% from 2014, showcasing its commitment to scaling operations while managing costs effectively.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025