Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Lam Research Corporation vs Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.

Cost Efficiency: Lam Research vs Broadridge Financial

__timestampBroadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.Lam Research Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201417614000002599828000
Thursday, January 1, 201518282000002974976000
Friday, January 1, 201619759000003266971000
Sunday, January 1, 201731096000004410261000
Monday, January 1, 201831696000005911966000
Tuesday, January 1, 201931319000005295100000
Wednesday, January 1, 202032651000005436043000
Friday, January 1, 202135708000007820844000
Saturday, January 1, 202241169000009355232000
Sunday, January 1, 202342755000009651591000
Monday, January 1, 202445729000007852595000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

A Tale of Two Giants: Cost of Revenue Efficiency

In the ever-evolving landscape of the tech and financial sectors, understanding cost efficiency is paramount. This analysis juxtaposes Lam Research Corporation, a leader in semiconductor manufacturing, with Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., a titan in financial technology. Over the past decade, Lam Research has consistently outpaced Broadridge in cost of revenue, peaking in 2023 with a staggering 265% increase from 2014. Meanwhile, Broadridge has shown a steady growth of 160% in the same period.

Key Insights

  • Lam Research: Witnessed a significant surge in 2021, with costs rising by 44% from the previous year, reflecting its aggressive expansion and innovation strategies.
  • Broadridge Financial: Demonstrated a more stable growth trajectory, with a notable 10% increase in 2023, underscoring its resilience in a volatile market.

This comparison highlights the diverse strategies and market dynamics influencing these industry leaders.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025