Infosys Limited or Cadence Design Systems, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Infosys vs. Cadence

__timestampCadence Design Systems, Inc.Infosys Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 20145133070001079000000
Thursday, January 1, 20155124140001176000000
Friday, January 1, 20165203000001020000000
Sunday, January 1, 20175533420001279000000
Monday, January 1, 20185730750001220000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196214790001504000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206708850001223000000
Friday, January 1, 20217492800001391000000
Saturday, January 1, 20228463400001678000000
Sunday, January 1, 20239206490001632000000
Monday, January 1, 20241039766000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Managing SG&A Costs: Infosys vs. Cadence Design Systems

In the competitive landscape of global business, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. From 2014 to 2023, Infosys Limited and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. have shown distinct strategies in handling these costs. Infosys, a leader in IT services, consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, averaging around 1.32 billion annually. In contrast, Cadence, a pioneer in electronic design automation, maintained a more modest average of approximately 648 million, nearly half of Infosys's expenditure.

Despite the higher costs, Infosys's SG&A expenses grew by about 51% over the decade, while Cadence saw a sharper increase of 79%. This trend suggests Cadence is investing more aggressively in administrative and sales functions, potentially to fuel growth. As businesses navigate the post-pandemic economy, these insights into cost management strategies offer valuable lessons for optimizing operational efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025