Cost of Revenue Comparison: Eaton Corporation plc vs Ferrovial SE

Eaton vs Ferrovial: A Decade of Cost Dynamics

__timestampEaton Corporation plcFerrovial SE
Wednesday, January 1, 2014156460000001131000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015142920000001143000000
Friday, January 1, 2016134000000001267000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017137560000001345000000
Monday, January 1, 201814511000000985000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201914338000000949000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020124080000001005000000
Friday, January 1, 2021132930000001077000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022138650000001197000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023147630000001129000000
Monday, January 1, 202415375000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, Eaton Corporation plc and Ferrovial SE stand as titans in their respective industries. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2023, these companies have showcased contrasting trajectories in their cost of revenue. Eaton Corporation, a leader in power management, has consistently maintained a high cost of revenue, peaking in 2014 with a 15% higher cost than its 2020 low. Meanwhile, Ferrovial SE, a Spanish multinational focused on infrastructure, has demonstrated a more stable cost pattern, with a slight dip in 2019. By 2023, Eaton's cost of revenue was approximately 13 times that of Ferrovial, highlighting the scale and operational differences between the two. This comparison not only underscores the diverse challenges faced by companies in different sectors but also offers insights into their strategic financial management over the years.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025