Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: ASML Holding N.V. vs MicroStrategy Incorporated

ASML vs MicroStrategy: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampASML Holding N.V.MicroStrategy Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 20143358907000135210000
Thursday, January 1, 20153391700000101108000
Friday, January 1, 2016375030000093147000
Sunday, January 1, 2017497610000096649000
Monday, January 1, 2018622570000099499000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019691990000099974000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020718130000091055000
Friday, January 1, 2021880200000091909000
Saturday, January 1, 202210660700000102989000
Sunday, January 1, 202313422400000109944000
Monday, January 1, 202413770900000129468000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

A Tale of Two Companies: ASML Holding N.V. vs MicroStrategy Incorporated

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology and finance, understanding cost efficiency is crucial. ASML Holding N.V., a titan in the semiconductor industry, and MicroStrategy Incorporated, a leader in business intelligence, offer a fascinating study in contrasts. From 2014 to 2023, ASML's cost of revenue surged by approximately 300%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and innovation in chip-making technology. In contrast, MicroStrategy's cost of revenue remained relatively stable, with only a slight increase of around 8% over the same period. This stability highlights MicroStrategy's focus on optimizing operational efficiency. By 2023, ASML's cost of revenue was nearly 100 times that of MicroStrategy, underscoring the scale and scope of its operations. This comparison not only highlights the differing business models but also offers insights into how companies manage growth and efficiency in a competitive market.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025