ASML Holding N.V. vs Cadence Design Systems, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored

Cost Efficiency: ASML vs Cadence Design Systems

__timestampASML Holding N.V.Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20143358907000223706000
Thursday, January 1, 20153391700000238453000
Friday, January 1, 20163750300000256492000
Sunday, January 1, 20174976100000237390000
Monday, January 1, 20186225700000258747000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196919900000266357000
Wednesday, January 1, 20207181300000305498000
Friday, January 1, 20218802000000307006000
Saturday, January 1, 202210660700000371623000
Sunday, January 1, 202313422400000435041000
Monday, January 1, 202413770900000210902000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Exploring Cost Efficiency: ASML Holding N.V. vs Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, cost efficiency remains a pivotal factor for success. This analysis delves into the cost of revenue trends for ASML Holding N.V. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. over the past decade, from 2014 to 2023. ASML, a leader in semiconductor manufacturing, has seen its cost of revenue surge by approximately 300%, reflecting its expanding operations and market dominance. In contrast, Cadence Design Systems, a key player in electronic design automation, has maintained a more modest increase of around 95% in the same period.

The data reveals ASML's aggressive growth strategy, with its cost of revenue peaking at over $13 billion in 2023, compared to Cadence's $435 million. This stark contrast highlights the differing scales and operational strategies of these industry giants. As the tech industry continues to grow, understanding these financial dynamics is crucial for investors and analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025