Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? ASML Holding N.V. or MicroStrategy Incorporated

ASML vs. MicroStrategy: A Decade of SG&A Cost Strategies

__timestampASML Holding N.V.MicroStrategy Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 2014318672000321429000
Thursday, January 1, 2015345700000229254000
Friday, January 1, 2016374800000238202000
Sunday, January 1, 2017416600000254773000
Monday, January 1, 2018488000000291659000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019520500000277932000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020544900000229046000
Friday, January 1, 2021725600000255642000
Saturday, January 1, 2022909600000258303000
Sunday, January 1, 20231113200000264983000
Monday, January 1, 20241165700000278618000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of global business, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. ASML Holding N.V. and MicroStrategy Incorporated, two giants in their respective fields, offer a fascinating study in cost optimization from 2014 to 2023.

ASML's Strategic Growth

ASML Holding N.V., a leader in the semiconductor industry, has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 250% over the past decade. This increase reflects its strategic investments in innovation and market expansion, crucial for maintaining its competitive edge.

MicroStrategy's Cost Control

Conversely, MicroStrategy Incorporated, a prominent player in business intelligence, has maintained a relatively stable SG&A expense profile, with only a 15% increase over the same period. This stability highlights its focus on cost control and operational efficiency.

Conclusion

While ASML's rising expenses indicate aggressive growth strategies, MicroStrategy's steady costs suggest a disciplined approach to financial management. Both strategies have their merits, depending on the company's long-term goals.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025