Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: ASML Holding N.V. vs Lam Research Corporation

ASML vs Lam: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampASML Holding N.V.Lam Research Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201433589070002599828000
Thursday, January 1, 201533917000002974976000
Friday, January 1, 201637503000003266971000
Sunday, January 1, 201749761000004410261000
Monday, January 1, 201862257000005911966000
Tuesday, January 1, 201969199000005295100000
Wednesday, January 1, 202071813000005436043000
Friday, January 1, 202188020000007820844000
Saturday, January 1, 2022106607000009355232000
Sunday, January 1, 2023134224000009651591000
Monday, January 1, 2024137709000007852595000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

A Tale of Two Giants: ASML Holding N.V. vs Lam Research Corporation

In the ever-evolving semiconductor industry, cost efficiency is a critical metric for success. ASML Holding N.V. and Lam Research Corporation, two titans in this field, have shown distinct trends in their cost of revenue from 2014 to 2023. ASML's cost of revenue has surged by approximately 300% over this period, reflecting its aggressive expansion and innovation strategies. In contrast, Lam Research has seen a more modest increase of around 270%, indicating a steady yet cautious growth approach.

Key Insights

  • 2014-2018: ASML's cost of revenue grew by 85%, while Lam Research saw a 127% increase, highlighting Lam's initial aggressive growth.
  • 2019-2023: ASML's costs soared by 94%, outpacing Lam's 82% rise, showcasing ASML's dominance in recent years.

This data underscores the dynamic strategies of these industry leaders, with ASML's recent growth trajectory suggesting a more aggressive market capture strategy.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025