__timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 5229000000 | 1414327000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 5707000000 | 794867000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 6314000000 | 813873000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 8005000000 | 1022959000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 9436000000 | 898311000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 8222000000 | 1523644000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 9510000000 | 1542450000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 12149000000 | 1535085000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 13792000000 | 1535401000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 14133000000 | 3064600000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 14279000000 | 3107800000 |
Infusing magic into the data realm
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, the cost of revenue efficiency is a critical metric for companies. From 2014 to 2024, Applied Materials, Inc., a leader in the semiconductor industry, has consistently outperformed Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., a major player in the gaming sector, in terms of cost efficiency. Over this decade, Applied Materials saw a staggering 173% increase in its cost of revenue, peaking at approximately $14.3 billion in 2024. In contrast, Take-Two's cost of revenue grew by 120%, reaching around $3.1 billion in the same year.
This comparison highlights the distinct financial dynamics between hardware and software industries. While both companies have shown growth, the semiconductor giant's ability to scale its operations more efficiently underscores the capital-intensive nature of its industry. As we move forward, understanding these trends will be crucial for investors and industry analysts alike.
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Applied Materials, Inc. and Corning Incorporated
Cost of Revenue Trends: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Garmin Ltd.
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Examining Key Revenue Metrics
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Applied Materials, Inc. and Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation's Expenses
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. vs HubSpot, Inc.
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Applied Materials, Inc. and Wipro Limited
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Applied Materials, Inc. vs HP Inc.
Gross Profit Trends Compared: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Electronic Arts Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and II-VI Incorporated
Analyzing R&D Budgets: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. and Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared