Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: Lam Research Corporation vs Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Comparing EBITDA growth: Lam Research vs. FIS

__timestampFidelity National Information Services, Inc.Lam Research Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20141846200000977923000
Thursday, January 1, 201519010000001155224000
Friday, January 1, 201624740000001365284000
Sunday, January 1, 201727000000002218837000
Monday, January 1, 201828370000003539694000
Tuesday, January 1, 201932440000002774013000
Wednesday, January 1, 202043190000002942327000
Friday, January 1, 202150210000004789174000
Saturday, January 1, 202228750000005715561000
Sunday, January 1, 202329060000005637608000
Monday, January 1, 202417090000004905157000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology and financial services, Lam Research Corporation and Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) have emerged as industry leaders. Over the past decade, these companies have demonstrated remarkable growth in their EBITDA, a key indicator of financial health and operational efficiency.

From 2014 to 2023, Lam Research's EBITDA surged by approximately 476%, peaking in 2022 with a notable 5.7 billion. Meanwhile, FIS experienced a 57% increase, reaching its zenith in 2021. However, 2022 saw a dip for FIS, highlighting the volatile nature of the financial services sector.

This comparison underscores the resilience of Lam Research in the tech industry, while FIS's fluctuations reflect broader economic challenges. As we look to the future, these trends offer valuable insights for investors and industry analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025