Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? QUALCOMM Incorporated or Pure Storage, Inc.

SG&A Optimization: QUALCOMM vs. Pure Storage

__timestampPure Storage, Inc.QUALCOMM Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 2014606520002290000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151846740002344000000
Friday, January 1, 20163159760002385000000
Sunday, January 1, 20174446870002658000000
Monday, January 1, 20185752000002986000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20197216170002195000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20208911750002074000000
Friday, January 1, 20218984910002339000000
Saturday, January 1, 20229889820002570000000
Sunday, January 1, 202311216050002483000000
Monday, January 1, 202411972640002759000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Optimizing SG&A: A Tale of Two Tech Giants

In the competitive world of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2024, QUALCOMM Incorporated and Pure Storage, Inc. have showcased contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs.

QUALCOMM, a leader in wireless technology, consistently maintained higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $2.99 billion in 2018. This reflects their expansive global operations and significant investment in marketing and administration. In contrast, Pure Storage, a rising star in data storage solutions, demonstrated a more aggressive growth in SG&A, increasing from $60 million in 2014 to nearly $1.2 billion by 2024. This 19-fold increase highlights their rapid expansion and market penetration efforts.

While QUALCOMM's expenses remained relatively stable, Pure Storage's strategic investments in SG&A underscore their commitment to scaling operations and capturing market share. This comparison offers valuable insights into how tech companies balance growth with operational efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025