Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? QUALCOMM Incorporated or Leidos Holdings, Inc.

SG&A Cost Optimization: QUALCOMM vs. Leidos

__timestampLeidos Holdings, Inc.QUALCOMM Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 20143100000002290000000
Thursday, January 1, 20152320000002344000000
Friday, January 1, 20163340000002385000000
Sunday, January 1, 20175520000002658000000
Monday, January 1, 20187290000002986000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196890000002195000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20207700000002074000000
Friday, January 1, 20218600000002339000000
Saturday, January 1, 20229500000002570000000
Sunday, January 1, 20239420000002483000000
Monday, January 1, 20249830000002759000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of technology and defense, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, QUALCOMM Incorporated and Leidos Holdings, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs.

QUALCOMM's Consistent Strategy

From 2014 to 2023, QUALCOMM's SG&A expenses have shown a steady pattern, peaking in 2018 with a 30% increase from 2014. Despite fluctuations, QUALCOMM maintained an average SG&A expense of approximately $2.46 billion, reflecting a consistent approach to cost management.

Leidos' Dynamic Approach

Leidos Holdings, Inc., on the other hand, exhibited a more dynamic trend. Starting with lower expenses in 2014, Leidos saw a significant rise, reaching a peak in 2022 with a 206% increase from 2014. This suggests a strategic expansion and investment in administrative capabilities.

In conclusion, while QUALCOMM focuses on stability, Leidos embraces adaptability, each optimizing SG&A costs in alignment with their corporate strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025