Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Curtiss-Wright Corporation or Rentokil Initial plc

SG&A Cost Management: Curtiss-Wright vs. Rentokil

__timestampCurtiss-Wright CorporationRentokil Initial plc
Wednesday, January 1, 2014426301000935700000
Thursday, January 1, 2015411801000965700000
Friday, January 1, 20163837930001197600000
Sunday, January 1, 20174185440001329600000
Monday, January 1, 20184331100001364000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019422272000322500000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020412825000352000000
Friday, January 1, 2021443096000348600000
Saturday, January 1, 2022445679000479000000
Sunday, January 1, 20234968120002870000000
Monday, January 1, 2024518857000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of business, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Rentokil Initial plc, two industry giants, have taken different paths in optimizing these costs over the past decade.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

From 2014 to 2023, Curtiss-Wright Corporation maintained a relatively stable SG&A expense, averaging around $429 million annually. This consistency reflects a disciplined approach, with fluctuations of less than 10% year-over-year. In contrast, Rentokil Initial plc experienced more volatility, with expenses peaking at nearly $2.87 billion in 2023, a staggering 200% increase from its 2019 low.

Strategic Insights

Curtiss-Wright's steady expense management suggests a focus on operational efficiency, while Rentokil's fluctuations may indicate strategic investments or restructuring efforts. Understanding these trends offers valuable insights into each company's financial health and strategic priorities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025