Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Analog Devices, Inc. or Teradyne, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Analog Devices vs. Teradyne

__timestampAnalog Devices, Inc.Teradyne, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014454676000319713000
Thursday, January 1, 2015478972000306313000
Friday, January 1, 2016461438000315682000
Sunday, January 1, 2017691046000348287000
Monday, January 1, 2018695937000390669000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019648094000437083000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020659923000464769000
Friday, January 1, 2021915418000547559000
Saturday, January 1, 20221266175000558103000
Sunday, January 1, 20231273584000571426000
Monday, January 1, 202410686400000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive world of semiconductor manufacturing, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Analog Devices, Inc. and Teradyne, Inc. have showcased distinct strategies in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Analog Devices saw a significant increase in SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $1.27 billion in 2023, reflecting a 180% rise from 2014. In contrast, Teradyne's SG&A expenses grew more modestly, reaching around $571 million in 2023, marking an 80% increase over the same period.

While Analog Devices' expenses surged, possibly due to strategic investments or acquisitions, Teradyne maintained a steadier growth, indicating a more conservative approach. The data for 2024 is incomplete, highlighting the need for ongoing analysis. This comparison underscores the diverse strategies companies employ to balance growth and cost management in a dynamic industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025