Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Analog Devices, Inc. or Trimble Inc.

SG&A Cost Optimization: Analog Devices vs. Trimble

__timestampAnalog Devices, Inc.Trimble Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014454676000634689000
Thursday, January 1, 2015478972000629900000
Friday, January 1, 2016461438000633600000
Sunday, January 1, 2017691046000706500000
Monday, January 1, 2018695937000829600000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019648094000834800000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020659923000767900000
Friday, January 1, 2021915418000875900000
Saturday, January 1, 20221266175000975800000
Sunday, January 1, 202312735840001070500000
Monday, January 1, 20241068640000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Analog Devices, Inc. and Trimble Inc. have demonstrated distinct strategies in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Analog Devices saw a significant increase in SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately 1.27 billion in 2023, a 180% rise from 2014. In contrast, Trimble Inc. maintained a steadier trajectory, with a 69% increase over the same period, reaching around 1.07 billion in 2023. Notably, Analog Devices experienced a sharp rise post-2020, coinciding with strategic acquisitions and expansions. Meanwhile, Trimble's consistent growth reflects a balanced approach to scaling operations. The data for 2024 is incomplete, highlighting the dynamic nature of financial forecasting. As these companies continue to evolve, their SG&A strategies will remain pivotal in shaping their financial futures.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025