Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Analog Devices, Inc. or Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Analog Devices vs. Take-Two Interactive

__timestampAnalog Devices, Inc.Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014454676000402370000
Thursday, January 1, 2015478972000410434000
Friday, January 1, 2016461438000390761000
Sunday, January 1, 2017691046000496862000
Monday, January 1, 2018695937000503920000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019648094000672634000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020659923000776659000
Friday, January 1, 2021915418000835668000
Saturday, January 1, 202212661750001027284000
Sunday, January 1, 202312735840002435700000
Monday, January 1, 202410686400002266300000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Analog Devices, Inc. and Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. have showcased contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2024, Analog Devices maintained a relatively stable SG&A expense growth, peaking at approximately 1.27 billion in 2023. In contrast, Take-Two Interactive experienced a dramatic surge, with expenses more than doubling from 2022 to 2023, reaching a staggering 2.44 billion.

This divergence highlights Analog Devices' consistent cost management, while Take-Two's expenses reflect its aggressive expansion strategy. By 2024, Analog Devices managed to reduce its SG&A expenses by 16% from the previous year, whereas Take-Two's expenses remained high, albeit slightly reduced. This analysis underscores the importance of strategic financial planning in navigating the complexities of corporate growth and sustainability.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025