__timestamp | C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. | Trane Technologies plc |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 320213000 | 2503900000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 358760000 | 2541100000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 375061000 | 2606500000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 413404000 | 2720700000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 449610000 | 2903200000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 497806000 | 3129800000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 496122000 | 2270600000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 526371000 | 2446300000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 603415000 | 2545900000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 624266000 | 2963200000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 639624000 | 3580400000 |
Unlocking the unknown
In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the spending patterns of industry leaders can offer invaluable insights. Trane Technologies plc and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. have demonstrated distinct trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Trane Technologies consistently outpaced C.H. Robinson, with SG&A expenses peaking at approximately $2.96 billion in 2023, marking a 19% increase from 2014. In contrast, C.H. Robinson's SG&A expenses grew by nearly 100% over the same period, reaching around $639 million in 2024. This divergence highlights Trane's stable yet substantial investment in administrative functions, while C.H. Robinson's rapid growth suggests a strategic expansion. Notably, data for Trane Technologies in 2024 is missing, indicating potential shifts in their financial strategy. These patterns underscore the dynamic nature of corporate financial management in today's competitive market.
Cost of Revenue Trends: Trane Technologies plc vs C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Who Generates Higher Gross Profit? Trane Technologies plc or C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Trane Technologies plc and Pool Corporation
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Trane Technologies plc and U-Haul Holding Company
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Trane Technologies plc vs Graco Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Trane Technologies plc vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. Trends and Insights
Trane Technologies plc vs Curtiss-Wright Corporation: SG&A Expense Trends
Trane Technologies plc or Nordson Corporation: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Comprehensive EBITDA Comparison: Trane Technologies plc vs C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Trane Technologies plc and Rentokil Initial plc