__timestamp | Pool Corporation | Trane Technologies plc |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 454470000 | 2503900000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 459422000 | 2541100000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 485228000 | 2606500000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 520918000 | 2720700000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 556284000 | 2903200000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 583679000 | 3129800000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 659931000 | 2270600000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 786808000 | 2446300000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 907629000 | 2545900000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 912927000 | 2963200000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 3580400000 |
Unleashing insights
In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Trane Technologies plc and Pool Corporation, two industry leaders, have demonstrated distinct trajectories in their SG&A expenses over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Trane Technologies saw a steady increase, peaking in 2019 with a 38% rise from 2014 levels. However, a notable dip occurred in 2020, reflecting broader economic challenges. Meanwhile, Pool Corporation's SG&A expenses surged by 101% over the same period, highlighting its aggressive expansion strategy. The year 2023 marked a significant milestone for both companies, with Trane Technologies rebounding to near-peak levels and Pool Corporation maintaining its upward trend. This analysis underscores the importance of strategic cost management in navigating economic fluctuations and sustaining growth.
Trane Technologies plc vs Pool Corporation: Annual Revenue Growth Compared
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Trane Technologies plc vs Pool Corporation
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Trane Technologies plc vs Comfort Systems USA, Inc. Trends and Insights
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Trane Technologies plc or Saia, Inc.
Gross Profit Analysis: Comparing Trane Technologies plc and Pool Corporation
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Trane Technologies plc vs AECOM
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Trane Technologies plc and U-Haul Holding Company
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Trane Technologies plc vs Graco Inc.
EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: Trane Technologies plc vs Pool Corporation
Trane Technologies plc and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Trane Technologies plc vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. Trends and Insights