Texas Instruments Incorporated or Nutanix, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Texas Instruments vs. Nutanix

__timestampNutanix, Inc.Texas Instruments Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 20141064970001843000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151857280001748000000
Friday, January 1, 20163227580001767000000
Sunday, January 1, 20175778700001694000000
Monday, January 1, 20187360580001684000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201910293370001645000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202012959360001623000000
Friday, January 1, 202112062900001666000000
Saturday, January 1, 202211451220001704000000
Sunday, January 1, 202311568970001825000000
Monday, January 1, 202411781490001794000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

A Tale of Two Companies: SG&A Management in Focus

In the competitive landscape of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) and Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) offer a fascinating study in contrasts. Over the past decade, Texas Instruments has consistently maintained its SG&A expenses around 1.7 billion annually, showcasing a stable cost management strategy. In contrast, Nutanix has seen a dramatic rise, with expenses increasing by over 1,000% from 2014 to 2024, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy.

While Texas Instruments' steady approach may appeal to conservative investors, Nutanix's rapid expansion could attract those seeking high growth potential. This divergence highlights the strategic choices companies make in balancing growth and cost control. As we look to the future, the question remains: will Nutanix's investment in growth pay off, or will Texas Instruments' steady hand continue to lead the way?

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025