__timestamp | Fiserv, Inc. | Leidos Holdings, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 975000000 | 310000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1034000000 | 232000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1101000000 | 334000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1150000000 | 552000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1228000000 | 729000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 3284000000 | 689000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 5652000000 | 770000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 5810000000 | 860000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 6059000000 | 950000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 6576000000 | 942000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 6564000000 | 983000000 |
Infusing magic into the data realm
In the competitive landscape of corporate finance, Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses play a pivotal role in shaping a company's profitability and operational efficiency. SG&A costs encompass a wide array of expenses, including salaries, marketing, and office supplies, which are essential for day-to-day operations but do not directly contribute to production. Understanding these costs can provide valuable insights into a company's management practices and financial health.
The chart presents a compelling comparison of SG&A expenses incurred by Fiserv, Inc. and Leidos Holdings, Inc. from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Fiserv has shown a remarkable trend, with SG&A expenses soaring from approximately $975 million in 2014 to an impressive $6.576 billion in 2023. This represents an astounding increase of over 575%, reflecting the company's aggressive growth strategy and expansion into new markets.
In contrast, Leidos Holdings has maintained a more modest trajectory. Starting at around $310 million in 2014, the company’s SG&A expenses have risen to approximately $942 million by 2023, marking a growth of about 203%. While this increase is significant, it pales in comparison to Fiserv's exponential rise, suggesting different strategic focuses and operational scales between the two companies.
Analyzing the yearly data reveals several interesting patterns. For instance, in 2019, Fiserv's SG&A expenses jumped dramatically to $3.284 billion, which could be attributed to strategic acquisitions and investments aimed at enhancing its technological capabilities. This spike represents a staggering 220% increase from the previous year, indicating a pivotal moment in the company's growth journey.
Leidos Holdings, on the other hand, exhibited steadier growth, with its SG&A expenses gradually increasing each year. The company reached its peak SG&A expense of $942 million in 2023, showing a consistent investment in administrative and operational functions that support its core business areas, particularly in defense and technology services.
Understanding SG&A expenses is crucial for investors and stakeholders. High SG&A costs can indicate inefficiencies or aggressive growth strategies, while lower costs may suggest a leaner operation or under-investment in essential areas. The stark contrast between Fiserv and Leidos highlights how different operational strategies can lead to varied financial outcomes.
As the business environment continues to evolve, monitoring these expenses will be vital for assessing each company's ability to adapt and thrive. Investors should pay close attention to how these companies manage their SG&A costs in relation to revenue growth, as this can provide critical insights into their operational effectiveness and long-term sustainability.
In conclusion, the analysis of SG&A expenses for Fiserv, Inc. and Leidos Holdings, Inc. not only sheds light on their financial strategies but also serves as a reminder of the importance of efficient cost management in achieving corporate success. As these companies continue to navigate the complexities of their respective industries, understanding the dynamics of SG&A will remain a key factor in their ongoing performance and growth.
Fiserv, Inc. vs Leidos Holdings, Inc.: Annual Revenue Growth Compared
Fiserv, Inc. vs Leidos Holdings, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Key Insights on Gross Profit: Fiserv, Inc. vs Leidos Holdings, Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Fiserv, Inc. and Manhattan Associates, Inc.
Fiserv, Inc. or Teradyne, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Fiserv, Inc. vs Jabil Inc.
Fiserv, Inc. or Super Micro Computer, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Fiserv, Inc. and Trimble Inc.
Who Generates More Revenue? Fiserv, Inc. or Leidos Holdings, Inc.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Fiserv, Inc. vs Leidos Holdings, Inc.
Fiserv, Inc. vs Leidos Holdings, Inc.: A Gross Profit Performance Breakdown
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Fiserv, Inc. or Leidos Holdings, Inc.