Fiserv, Inc. or Teradyne, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Fiserv vs. Teradyne

__timestampFiserv, Inc.Teradyne, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014975000000319713000
Thursday, January 1, 20151034000000306313000
Friday, January 1, 20161101000000315682000
Sunday, January 1, 20171150000000348287000
Monday, January 1, 20181228000000390669000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193284000000437083000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205652000000464769000
Friday, January 1, 20215810000000547559000
Saturday, January 1, 20226059000000558103000
Sunday, January 1, 20236576000000571426000
Monday, January 1, 202465640000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Fiserv vs. Teradyne: A Decade of SG&A Management

In the competitive landscape of financial technology and semiconductor testing, Fiserv, Inc. and Teradyne, Inc. have showcased distinct strategies in managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Fiserv's SG&A costs surged by over 570%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and investment strategies. In contrast, Teradyne maintained a more conservative approach, with a modest increase of approximately 79% in the same period.

While Fiserv's expenses peaked in 2023, reaching nearly 12 times that of Teradyne, the latter's steady growth highlights its efficient cost management. This divergence underscores the strategic choices each company has made in navigating their respective industries. As investors and analysts evaluate these trends, the question remains: does higher spending equate to greater market dominance, or does prudent management ensure long-term sustainability?

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025