QUALCOMM Incorporated or Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Comparing SG&A cost management: QUALCOMM vs. Monolithic Power Systems

__timestampMonolithic Power Systems, Inc.QUALCOMM Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 2014667550002290000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015723120002344000000
Friday, January 1, 2016830120002385000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017972570002658000000
Monday, January 1, 20181138030002986000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191335420002195000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201616700002074000000
Friday, January 1, 20212261900002339000000
Saturday, January 1, 20222735950002570000000
Sunday, January 1, 20232757400002483000000
Monday, January 1, 20242759000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: QUALCOMM or Monolithic Power Systems?

In the competitive landscape of technology giants, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2023, QUALCOMM Incorporated and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. have shown distinct approaches to handling these costs. QUALCOMM, a leader in wireless technology, consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $2.99 billion in 2018. In contrast, Monolithic Power Systems, a key player in power solutions, demonstrated a more conservative approach, with expenses growing from $67 million in 2014 to $276 million in 2023. Despite the disparity in absolute numbers, Monolithic Power Systems' expenses grew by over 300%, reflecting its rapid expansion. Meanwhile, QUALCOMM's expenses remained relatively stable, indicating a mature market position. This analysis highlights the strategic differences in cost management between an established giant and a growing innovator.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025