Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Apple Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc.

Apple vs. Pure Storage: SG&A Expense Trends Over a Decade

__timestampApple Inc.Pure Storage, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141199300000060652000
Thursday, January 1, 201514329000000184674000
Friday, January 1, 201614194000000315976000
Sunday, January 1, 201715261000000444687000
Monday, January 1, 201816705000000575200000
Tuesday, January 1, 201918245000000721617000
Wednesday, January 1, 202019916000000891175000
Friday, January 1, 202121973000000898491000
Saturday, January 1, 202225094000000988982000
Sunday, January 1, 2023249320000001121605000
Monday, January 1, 2024260970000001197264000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

A Decade of SG&A: Apple Inc. vs. Pure Storage, Inc.

In the ever-evolving tech industry, operational efficiency is key to maintaining a competitive edge. Over the past decade, Apple Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting strategies in managing their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses.

Apple Inc.: A Steady Climb

Since 2014, Apple has seen a consistent increase in SG&A expenses, growing by approximately 117% by 2024. This reflects Apple's expansive growth and its commitment to maintaining a robust operational framework to support its global dominance.

Pure Storage, Inc.: Rapid Expansion

Conversely, Pure Storage, Inc. has experienced a staggering 1,873% increase in SG&A expenses over the same period. This surge underscores the company's aggressive expansion strategy as it seeks to carve out a significant market share in the storage solutions sector.

Conclusion

While Apple focuses on steady growth, Pure Storage's rapid increase in SG&A expenses highlights its ambitious growth trajectory. These insights offer a glimpse into the strategic priorities of two tech giants.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025