__timestamp | Apple Inc. | Pure Storage, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 11993000000 | 60652000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 14329000000 | 184674000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 14194000000 | 315976000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 15261000000 | 444687000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 16705000000 | 575200000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 18245000000 | 721617000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 19916000000 | 891175000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 21973000000 | 898491000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 25094000000 | 988982000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 24932000000 | 1121605000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 26097000000 | 1197264000 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
In the ever-evolving tech industry, operational efficiency is key to maintaining a competitive edge. Over the past decade, Apple Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting strategies in managing their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses.
Since 2014, Apple has seen a consistent increase in SG&A expenses, growing by approximately 117% by 2024. This reflects Apple's expansive growth and its commitment to maintaining a robust operational framework to support its global dominance.
Conversely, Pure Storage, Inc. has experienced a staggering 1,873% increase in SG&A expenses over the same period. This surge underscores the company's aggressive expansion strategy as it seeks to carve out a significant market share in the storage solutions sector.
While Apple focuses on steady growth, Pure Storage's rapid increase in SG&A expenses highlights its ambitious growth trajectory. These insights offer a glimpse into the strategic priorities of two tech giants.
Who Generates More Revenue? Apple Inc. or Pure Storage, Inc.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Apple Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc.
Gross Profit Trends Compared: Apple Inc. vs Pure Storage, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Apple Inc. or Western Digital Corporation
Apple Inc. and Seagate Technology Holdings plc: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Apple Inc. vs ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.: SG&A Expense Trends
Who Prioritizes Innovation? R&D Spending Compared for Apple Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Apple Inc. and Leidos Holdings, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Apple Inc. vs Zebra Technologies Corporation
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Apple Inc. or Teradyne, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Apple Inc. and SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Apple Inc. vs CyberArk Software Ltd.