Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Adobe Inc. and Autodesk, Inc.

Adobe vs. Autodesk: A Decade of SG&A Expense Trends

__timestampAdobe Inc.Autodesk, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201422151400001090900000
Thursday, January 1, 201522151610001281300000
Friday, January 1, 201624879070001308900000
Sunday, January 1, 201728222980001310300000
Monday, January 1, 201833657270001392500000
Tuesday, January 1, 201941249840001524000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202045590000001715900000
Friday, January 1, 202154060000001854200000
Saturday, January 1, 202261870000002194800000
Sunday, January 1, 202367640000002277000000
Monday, January 1, 202472930000002443000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

A Decade of SG&A: Adobe vs. Autodesk

In the ever-evolving tech landscape, operational efficiency is paramount. Over the past decade, Adobe Inc. and Autodesk, Inc. have showcased distinct trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. Adobe's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 230% from 2014 to 2024, reflecting its aggressive growth and expansion strategies. In contrast, Autodesk's expenses have grown by about 124% over the same period, indicating a more measured approach.

Key Insights

  • Adobe's Growth: Adobe's SG&A expenses have consistently outpaced Autodesk's, peaking at an estimated $7.3 billion in 2024.
  • Autodesk's Strategy: Autodesk's expenses, while growing, remain more stable, reaching around $2.4 billion in 2024.
  • Trend Analysis: Both companies show a steady upward trend, but Adobe's steeper curve suggests a more aggressive market positioning.

This analysis provides a window into the strategic priorities of these tech giants, offering valuable insights for investors and industry watchers.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025