Adobe Inc. and Fair Isaac Corporation: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

Adobe vs. Fair Isaac: SG&A Spending Trends Unveiled

__timestampAdobe Inc.Fair Isaac Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20142215140000278203000
Thursday, January 1, 20152215161000300002000
Friday, January 1, 20162487907000328940000
Sunday, January 1, 20172822298000339796000
Monday, January 1, 20183365727000380362000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194124984000414086000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204559000000420930000
Friday, January 1, 20215406000000396281000
Saturday, January 1, 20226187000000383863000
Sunday, January 1, 20236764000000400565000
Monday, January 1, 20247293000000462834000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

SG&A Spending Trends: Adobe Inc. vs. Fair Isaac Corporation

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the spending patterns of industry giants can offer valuable insights. Over the past decade, Adobe Inc. has demonstrated a robust growth trajectory in its Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses, increasing by approximately 229% from 2014 to 2024. This reflects Adobe's strategic investments in marketing, sales, and administrative functions to bolster its market position.

Conversely, Fair Isaac Corporation, known for its FICO credit scoring services, has shown a more modest increase of around 66% in SG&A expenses over the same period. This suggests a more conservative approach, possibly focusing on optimizing existing operations rather than aggressive expansion.

These contrasting strategies highlight the diverse approaches companies take in managing operational costs, with Adobe's aggressive growth strategy contrasting with Fair Isaac's steady, measured approach.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025