Lam Research Corporation or Keysight Technologies, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Keysight vs. Lam Research

__timestampKeysight Technologies, Inc.Lam Research Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014790000000613341000
Thursday, January 1, 2015793000000591611000
Friday, January 1, 2016818000000630954000
Sunday, January 1, 20171049000000667485000
Monday, January 1, 20181205000000762219000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191155000000702407000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201097000000682479000
Friday, January 1, 20211195000000829875000
Saturday, January 1, 20221283000000885737000
Sunday, January 1, 20231307000000832753000
Monday, January 1, 20241395000000868247000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

SG&A Cost Management: A Tale of Two Tech Giants

In the competitive landscape of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Keysight Technologies, Inc. and Lam Research Corporation have demonstrated distinct approaches to SG&A cost management. From 2014 to 2024, Keysight consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $1.4 billion in 2024, a 76% increase from 2014. In contrast, Lam Research's SG&A expenses grew by about 42% over the same period, reaching nearly $869 million in 2024. This suggests that while Keysight invests heavily in administrative functions, Lam Research maintains a more conservative approach. The data highlights the strategic choices each company makes in balancing operational costs with growth ambitions. As investors and analysts evaluate these trends, understanding the nuances of SG&A management becomes essential in assessing long-term financial health.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025