__timestamp | CNH Industrial N.V. | Ferrovial SE |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 25534000000 | 1131000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 20357000000 | 1143000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 19539000000 | 1267000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 21621000000 | 1345000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 22958000000 | 985000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 21832000000 | 949000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 21327000000 | 1005000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 25951000000 | 1077000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 16797000000 | 1197000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 16805000000 | 1129000000 |
Cracking the code
In the ever-evolving landscape of global industries, cost efficiency remains a pivotal factor for success. This analysis delves into the cost of revenue trends for Ferrovial SE and CNH Industrial N.V. from 2014 to 2023. Over this decade, CNH Industrial N.V. consistently reported a higher cost of revenue, peaking in 2021 with a 25% increase from its lowest point in 2022. Meanwhile, Ferrovial SE maintained a more stable trajectory, with its cost of revenue fluctuating within a narrower range, highlighting its strategic cost management.
This comparative analysis underscores the importance of strategic cost management in maintaining competitive advantage in the global market.
Ferrovial SE vs China Eastern Airlines Corporation Limited: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Ferrovial SE vs Avery Dennison Corporation
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Ferrovial SE vs Graco Inc.
Ferrovial SE vs Comfort Systems USA, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Ferrovial SE vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Ferrovial SE vs AECOM: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Ferrovial SE and CNH Industrial N.V.: A Detailed Gross Profit Analysis
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Ferrovial SE and Pool Corporation
Comparative EBITDA Analysis: Ferrovial SE vs CNH Industrial N.V.