__timestamp | Ferrovial SE | Graco Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1131000000 | 554394000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1143000000 | 601785000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1267000000 | 621054000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1345000000 | 681695000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 985000000 | 770753000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 949000000 | 786289000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1005000000 | 795178000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1077000000 | 953659000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1197000000 | 1086082000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1129000000 | 1034585000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 990855000 |
Unleashing insights
In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for evaluating a company's efficiency and profitability. This comparison between Ferrovial SE and Graco Inc. offers a fascinating glimpse into their financial journeys from 2014 to 2023.
Ferrovial SE, a titan in infrastructure and services, has shown a consistent upward trend in its cost of revenue. Starting at approximately 1.13 billion in 2014, it peaked at 1.35 billion in 2017, reflecting a 19% increase. This growth underscores Ferrovial's strategic investments and expansion efforts.
Graco Inc., a leader in fluid handling systems, has also demonstrated resilience. From 2014 to 2023, its cost of revenue surged by 87%, reaching over 1 billion in 2022. This remarkable growth highlights Graco's adaptability and market penetration.
While the data for 2024 is incomplete, the trends from the past decade provide valuable insights into these companies' financial strategies and market positions.
This analysis not only sheds light on the financial health of Ferrovial SE and Graco Inc. but also offers a broader understanding of industry dynamics in the past decade.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Ferrovial SE vs Owens Corning
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Ferrovial SE vs XPO Logistics, Inc.
Ferrovial SE or Graco Inc.: Who Leads in Yearly Revenue?
Ferrovial SE vs China Eastern Airlines Corporation Limited: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Ferrovial SE vs Avery Dennison Corporation
Ferrovial SE vs CNH Industrial N.V.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Ferrovial SE vs Comfort Systems USA, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Ferrovial SE vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Ferrovial SE vs AECOM: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
EBITDA Analysis: Evaluating Ferrovial SE Against Graco Inc.