__timestamp | Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | W.W. Grainger, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 2716113000 | 5650711000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 2593849000 | 5741956000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 2580026000 | 6022647000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 2691982000 | 6327301000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 2867103000 | 6873000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 3100466000 | 7089000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 3379180000 | 7559000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 3657530000 | 8302000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 3899622000 | 9379000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 4304810000 | 9982000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 8202847000 | 10410000000 |
Cracking the code
In the ever-evolving landscape of American business, W.W. Grainger, Inc. and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation stand as titans in their respective fields. Over the past decade, these companies have showcased contrasting trajectories in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2023, W.W. Grainger, Inc. consistently outpaced Booz Allen Hamilton, with costs peaking at nearly $10 billion in 2023, marking a 77% increase from 2014. In contrast, Booz Allen Hamilton's cost of revenue grew by approximately 59% over the same period, reaching $4.3 billion in 2023. This divergence highlights the distinct operational strategies and market dynamics each company faces. Notably, the data for 2024 reveals a significant spike for Booz Allen Hamilton, suggesting potential strategic shifts or market expansions. As we delve into these figures, the narrative of growth, adaptation, and market positioning becomes evident, offering valuable insights for investors and industry analysts alike.
W.W. Grainger, Inc. vs Snap-on Incorporated: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for W.W. Grainger, Inc. and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: W.W. Grainger, Inc. vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
W.W. Grainger, Inc. vs Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation: Examining Key Revenue Metrics
W.W. Grainger, Inc. vs Carlisle Companies Incorporated: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: W.W. Grainger, Inc. and Pentair plc
Cost of Revenue Comparison: W.W. Grainger, Inc. vs Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: W.W. Grainger, Inc. and IDEX Corporation
W.W. Grainger, Inc. vs RB Global, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
W.W. Grainger, Inc. vs Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation: A Gross Profit Performance Breakdown
W.W. Grainger, Inc. or Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
A Professional Review of EBITDA: W.W. Grainger, Inc. Compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation