__timestamp | J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. | Pool Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 5124095000 | 1603222000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 5041472000 | 1687495000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 5369826000 | 1829716000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 5990275000 | 1982899000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 7255657000 | 2127924000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 7659003000 | 2274592000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 8186697000 | 2805721000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 10298483000 | 3678492000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 12341472000 | 4246315000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 10433277000 | 3881551000 |
Unleashing insights
In the world of logistics and distribution, efficiency is key. J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. and Pool Corporation have been at the forefront of this battle since 2014. Over the past decade, J.B. Hunt has consistently outperformed Pool Corporation in terms of cost of revenue, showcasing a robust growth trajectory. By 2022, J.B. Hunt's cost of revenue had surged by approximately 140% from its 2014 levels, peaking at over $12 billion. In contrast, Pool Corporation, while also growing, saw a more modest increase of around 165%, reaching just over $4 billion in the same period. This comparison highlights J.B. Hunt's dominance in managing operational costs effectively, a testament to its strategic prowess in the logistics sector. As we look to the future, these trends offer valuable insights into the operational efficiencies of these industry leaders.
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. and Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
Revenue Insights: J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. and Pool Corporation Performance Compared
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. and AECOM
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. vs Saia, Inc.
J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. vs U-Haul Holding Company: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored