Block, Inc. or Zebra Technologies Corporation: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Block vs. Zebra: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampBlock, Inc.Zebra Technologies Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014206797000351518000
Thursday, January 1, 2015289084000763025000
Friday, January 1, 2016425869000751000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017503723000749000000
Monday, January 1, 2018750396000811000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191061082000826000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201688873000787000000
Friday, January 1, 20212600515000935000000
Saturday, January 1, 20223744800000982000000
Sunday, January 1, 20234228199000915000000
Monday, January 1, 2024981000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: Block, Inc. or Zebra Technologies Corporation?

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Block, Inc. and Zebra Technologies Corporation have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A management. From 2014 to 2023, Block, Inc. saw a staggering increase in SG&A expenses, growing by over 1,900%, while Zebra Technologies Corporation maintained a more stable trajectory with a modest 160% increase.

Block, Inc.'s rapid expansion in SG&A costs reflects its aggressive growth strategy, particularly in the tech sector. In contrast, Zebra Technologies Corporation's steady SG&A expenses highlight its focus on operational efficiency. As of 2023, Block, Inc.'s SG&A expenses were nearly four times higher than Zebra's, indicating a significant divergence in cost management strategies. This comparison offers valuable insights into how different companies navigate financial challenges in a competitive market.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025