Arista Networks, Inc. or Corning Incorporated: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Arista vs. Corning: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestampArista Networks, Inc.Corning Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 20141176690001211000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151848040001523000000
Friday, January 1, 20162061260001472000000
Sunday, January 1, 20172419030001467000000
Monday, January 1, 20182525620001799000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192758050001585000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20202956080001747000000
Friday, January 1, 20213692880001827000000
Saturday, January 1, 20224201960001898000000
Sunday, January 1, 20235181140001843000000
Monday, January 1, 20245499700001931000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: Arista Networks or Corning Incorporated?

In the competitive landscape of technology and manufacturing, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Arista Networks, Inc. and Corning Incorporated, two giants in their respective fields, have shown distinct trends in their SG&A management over the past decade.

From 2014 to 2023, Arista Networks has seen a steady increase in SG&A expenses, growing by approximately 340%. This reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in operational capabilities. In contrast, Corning Incorporated's SG&A expenses have increased by about 52% over the same period, indicating a more stable and controlled approach.

While Arista's rapid growth strategy is evident, Corning's consistent management of SG&A costs suggests a focus on efficiency and sustainability. As we look to the future, the ability to balance growth with cost management will be key for both companies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025