Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Adobe Inc. and Applied Materials, Inc.

Adobe vs. Applied Materials: Cost of Revenue Trends

__timestampAdobe Inc.Applied Materials, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20146220800005229000000
Thursday, January 1, 20157443170005707000000
Friday, January 1, 20168199080006314000000
Sunday, January 1, 201710104910008005000000
Monday, January 1, 201811949990009436000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201916727200008222000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202017220000009510000000
Friday, January 1, 2021186500000012149000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022216500000013792000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023235400000014133000000
Monday, January 1, 2024235800000014279000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Adobe Inc. vs. Applied Materials, Inc.

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for evaluating a company's financial health. Over the past decade, Adobe Inc. and Applied Materials, Inc. have shown distinct trajectories in their cost structures. From 2014 to 2024, Adobe's cost of revenue surged by approximately 280%, reflecting its strategic investments in cloud services and digital media. In contrast, Applied Materials, a leader in semiconductor manufacturing, experienced a 170% increase, driven by the growing demand for advanced chips.

Adobe's cost of revenue, which started at around $622 million in 2014, reached nearly $2.36 billion by 2024. Meanwhile, Applied Materials saw its costs rise from $5.23 billion to $14.28 billion in the same period. This comparison highlights the differing scales and growth strategies of these tech giants, offering valuable insights for investors and industry analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025