Adobe Inc. or Applied Materials, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Adobe vs. Applied Materials: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampAdobe Inc.Applied Materials, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20142215140000890000000
Thursday, January 1, 20152215161000897000000
Friday, January 1, 20162487907000819000000
Sunday, January 1, 20172822298000890000000
Monday, January 1, 201833657270001002000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194124984000982000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202045590000001093000000
Friday, January 1, 202154060000001229000000
Saturday, January 1, 202261870000001438000000
Sunday, January 1, 202367640000001628000000
Monday, January 1, 202472930000001797000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Adobe vs. Applied Materials: A Decade of SG&A Management

In the competitive landscape of technology giants, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Adobe Inc. and Applied Materials, Inc. have showcased contrasting strategies in handling these costs. Adobe's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 230% from 2014 to 2024, reflecting its aggressive growth and expansion strategies. In contrast, Applied Materials has maintained a more conservative approach, with a 100% increase over the same period.

Adobe's significant rise in SG&A expenses, peaking at $7.3 billion in 2024, underscores its investment in marketing and administrative capabilities to support its expanding product portfolio. Meanwhile, Applied Materials, with a peak of $1.8 billion, highlights its focus on operational efficiency. This comparison not only reveals the strategic priorities of these tech titans but also offers insights into their financial health and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025