Adobe Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Adobe vs. QUALCOMM: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampAdobe Inc.QUALCOMM Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 201422151400002290000000
Thursday, January 1, 201522151610002344000000
Friday, January 1, 201624879070002385000000
Sunday, January 1, 201728222980002658000000
Monday, January 1, 201833657270002986000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201941249840002195000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202045590000002074000000
Friday, January 1, 202154060000002339000000
Saturday, January 1, 202261870000002570000000
Sunday, January 1, 202367640000002483000000
Monday, January 1, 202472930000002759000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Adobe vs. QUALCOMM: A Decade of SG&A Management

In the ever-evolving tech industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Adobe Inc. and QUALCOMM Incorporated have showcased contrasting strategies in handling these costs. Adobe's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 230% from 2014 to 2024, reflecting its aggressive growth and expansion strategies. In contrast, QUALCOMM has maintained a more stable approach, with only a 20% increase over the same period.

Adobe's significant rise in SG&A expenses, peaking at $7.3 billion in 2024, indicates its investment in marketing and administrative capabilities to support its expanding product lines. Meanwhile, QUALCOMM's consistent expenses, averaging around $2.5 billion annually, suggest a focus on operational efficiency and cost control. This comparison highlights the diverse approaches these tech giants take in managing their operational costs, offering valuable insights into their strategic priorities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025