Adobe Inc. or Atlassian Corporation: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Adobe vs. Atlassian: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampAdobe Inc.Atlassian Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014221514000075782000
Thursday, January 1, 20152215161000125319000
Friday, January 1, 20162487907000178849000
Sunday, January 1, 20172822298000253693000
Monday, January 1, 20183365727000339232000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194124984000484070000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204559000000568092000
Friday, January 1, 20215406000000688151000
Saturday, January 1, 202261870000001046064000
Sunday, January 1, 202367640000001376223000
Monday, January 1, 202472930000001488074000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Adobe vs. Atlassian: A Decade of SG&A Management

In the ever-evolving tech industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Adobe Inc. and Atlassian Corporation have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A management. Adobe's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 229% from 2014 to 2024, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy. In contrast, Atlassian's expenses have increased by about 1,864% during the same period, indicating rapid expansion and investment in scaling operations.

Adobe's consistent growth in SG&A, averaging around 18% annually, suggests a stable yet expansive approach. Meanwhile, Atlassian's expenses, though starting from a smaller base, have grown at an average annual rate of 37%, showcasing its dynamic growth trajectory. This comparison highlights the strategic choices each company makes in balancing cost management with growth ambitions, offering valuable insights for investors and industry analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025