Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Thomson Reuters Corporation or RB Global, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Thomson Reuters vs. RB Global

__timestampRB Global, Inc.Thomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20142482200009209000000
Thursday, January 1, 20152549900008810000000
Friday, January 1, 20162835290008232000000
Sunday, January 1, 20173232700008079000000
Monday, January 1, 20183826760004131000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193823890004413000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204175230003999000000
Friday, January 1, 20214645990001624000000
Saturday, January 1, 20225399330001622000000
Sunday, January 1, 202374370000064000000
Monday, January 1, 2024773900000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive world of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Thomson Reuters Corporation and RB Global, Inc. have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2023, Thomson Reuters saw a dramatic reduction in SG&A expenses, plummeting from a high of $9.2 billion in 2014 to a mere $64 million in 2023. This represents a staggering 99% decrease, highlighting their aggressive cost-cutting measures.

Conversely, RB Global, Inc. experienced a steady increase in SG&A expenses, rising from $248 million in 2014 to $743 million in 2023, marking a 200% increase. This growth could indicate strategic investments in operations and expansion. The contrasting trends between these two companies offer a fascinating insight into different corporate strategies in managing operational costs.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025