Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Fiserv, Inc. or Marvell Technology, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Fiserv vs. Marvell

__timestampFiserv, Inc.Marvell Technology, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014975000000259169000
Thursday, January 1, 20151034000000273982000
Friday, January 1, 20161101000000280970000
Sunday, January 1, 20171150000000299727000
Monday, January 1, 20181228000000238166000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193284000000424360000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205652000000464580000
Friday, January 1, 20215810000000467240000
Saturday, January 1, 20226059000000955245000
Sunday, January 1, 20236576000000843600000
Monday, January 1, 20246564000000834000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of technology and financial services, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Fiserv, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc. have taken different paths in this regard over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Fiserv's SG&A expenses surged by over 570%, reflecting its aggressive expansion strategy. In contrast, Marvell Technology maintained a more stable trajectory, with a modest increase of around 225% during the same period.

While Fiserv's expenses peaked in 2023, Marvell's costs remained relatively consistent, suggesting a more controlled approach to cost management. This divergence highlights the strategic choices companies make in balancing growth and efficiency. As we look to the future, the ability to optimize SG&A costs will continue to be a key differentiator in the tech and financial sectors.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025