Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Fiserv, Inc. or Fortive Corporation

SG&A Cost Management: Fiserv vs. Fortive

__timestampFiserv, Inc.Fortive Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20149750000001416300000
Thursday, January 1, 201510340000001347900000
Friday, January 1, 201611010000001402000000
Sunday, January 1, 201711500000001537600000
Monday, January 1, 201812280000001728600000
Tuesday, January 1, 201932840000002219500000
Wednesday, January 1, 202056520000001748400000
Friday, January 1, 202158100000001839500000
Saturday, January 1, 202260590000001956600000
Sunday, January 1, 202365760000002062600000
Monday, January 1, 202465640000002173500000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Corporations

In the competitive world of corporate finance, optimizing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Fiserv, Inc. and Fortive Corporation have taken different paths in managing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Fiserv's SG&A expenses surged by over 570%, peaking at approximately $6.6 billion in 2023. In contrast, Fortive's expenses grew more modestly, increasing by about 45% to reach $2.1 billion in the same year.

This divergence highlights Fiserv's aggressive expansion strategy, possibly through acquisitions, while Fortive appears to focus on steady, organic growth. The data suggests that Fortive may have a more efficient cost management approach, maintaining a lower SG&A-to-revenue ratio. As investors and analysts evaluate these companies, understanding their cost optimization strategies provides valuable insights into their operational efficiencies and long-term sustainability.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025