Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Fiserv, Inc. or ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.

Comparing SG&A cost strategies of Fiserv and ASE Technology.

__timestampASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.Fiserv, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201413673000000975000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015142950000001034000000
Friday, January 1, 2016150990000001101000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017157670000001150000000
Monday, January 1, 2018195520000001228000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019223890000003284000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020238060000005652000000
Friday, January 1, 2021271910000005810000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022303840000006059000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023259300170006576000000
Monday, January 1, 2024273535130006564000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Comparative Analysis

In the competitive landscape of global business, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. This analysis delves into the SG&A cost optimization strategies of two industry giants: Fiserv, Inc. and ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd., over the past decade.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

From 2014 to 2023, ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. consistently reported higher SG&A expenses compared to Fiserv, Inc. However, the trend reveals a strategic shift. ASE's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 90%, peaking in 2022, while Fiserv's expenses increased by about 575%, indicating aggressive expansion or investment strategies.

Strategic Insights

Despite ASE's larger absolute expenses, Fiserv's rapid growth in SG&A costs suggests a focus on scaling operations. Investors and analysts should consider these trends when evaluating the companies' financial health and strategic priorities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025