Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Deere & Company or Rockwell Automation, Inc.

Deere vs. Rockwell: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

__timestampDeere & CompanyRockwell Automation, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201432844000001570100000
Thursday, January 1, 201528733000001506400000
Friday, January 1, 201627637000001467400000
Sunday, January 1, 201730666000001591500000
Monday, January 1, 201834555000001599000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201935510000001538500000
Wednesday, January 1, 202034770000001479800000
Friday, January 1, 202133830000001680000000
Saturday, January 1, 202238630000001766700000
Sunday, January 1, 202336010000002023700000
Monday, January 1, 202445070000002002600000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Comparative Analysis

In the competitive landscape of industrial giants, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Deere & Company and Rockwell Automation, Inc. have demonstrated distinct strategies in optimizing these costs.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

From 2014 to 2024, Deere & Company has seen a 37% increase in SG&A expenses, peaking in 2024. In contrast, Rockwell Automation, Inc. experienced a 28% rise, with a notable spike in 2023. Despite Deere's higher absolute expenses, their growth rate is more controlled compared to Rockwell's recent surge.

Strategic Insights

Deere's consistent expense management reflects a strategic focus on operational efficiency, while Rockwell's recent increase suggests potential investments in growth initiatives. Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into each company's financial health and strategic priorities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025