Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Broadcom Inc. or Seagate Technology Holdings plc

Broadcom vs. Seagate: A Decade of SG&A Cost Strategies

__timestampBroadcom Inc.Seagate Technology Holdings plc
Wednesday, January 1, 2014407000000722000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015486000000857000000
Friday, January 1, 2016806000000635000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017799000000606000000
Monday, January 1, 20181056000000562000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191709000000453000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201935000000473000000
Friday, January 1, 20211347000000502000000
Saturday, January 1, 20221382000000559000000
Sunday, January 1, 20231592000000491000000
Monday, January 1, 20244959000000460000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Optimizing SG&A: A Tale of Two Tech Giants

In the competitive world of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Broadcom Inc. and Seagate Technology Holdings plc, two industry leaders, have shown contrasting strategies over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Broadcom's SG&A expenses surged by over 1,100%, peaking in 2024. This increase reflects Broadcom's aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. In contrast, Seagate's SG&A costs decreased by approximately 36% during the same period, indicating a focus on cost efficiency and streamlined operations. By 2023, Seagate's SG&A expenses were less than a third of Broadcom's, highlighting its commitment to lean management. This divergence in strategies underscores the different paths companies can take to optimize operational costs, with Broadcom prioritizing growth and Seagate emphasizing efficiency. As the tech landscape evolves, these strategies will continue to shape their competitive positions.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025